ASSUMPTIONS OF THE ENERGY BALANCE METHOD AND RELATED ERRORS IN DETERMINING THE DYNAMIC RESPONSES OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36773/1818-1112-2026-140-2-51-65Keywords:
energy balance method, reliability, modelling errorAbstract
Modeling the behavior of a structural system following the sudden removal of a column is typically recommended based on non-linear dynamics (NLD) approaches for a specific loading history. Alternatively, under this specific hazard scenario (column removal), a simplified method for analyzing the damaged structural system is available, defined as the energy balance method. In the general case, the energy balance method (EBM) involves a non-linear static analysis (NLS) with incremental step-by-step application of controlled displacement at the node of the removed element, along with a simplified procedure for determining the dynamic response of the system based on its energy balance; this is widely considered a compromise between accuracy and complexity. The energy balance method allows for obtaining the maximum dynamic displacement value of the control point within the structural system under consideration at a specified load level. This parameter is sufficient for assessing the robustness of the structural system, since the core concept is to prevent collapse and, consequently, to determine the maximum value of the allowable response. For a real structure with an infinite number of degrees of freedom, the simplified method yields an approximate result, which, however, adequately reflects the outcomes obtained via 'rigorous' methods of dynamic non-linear analysis considering the loading history. The implicit error contained in the results when applying the energy balance method arises primarily due to a number of simplifications and assumptions, which are examined in detail in this paper.
References
Xu, G. Q. An energy-based partial pushdown analysis procedure for assessment of disproportionate collapse potential / G. Q. Xu, B. R. Ellingwood // Journal of Constructional Steel Research. – 2011. – Vol. 67. – P. 547–555.
Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss—Part I: Simplified assessment framework / B. A. Izzuddin, A. G. Vlassis, A. Y. Elghazouli, D. A. Nethercot // Engineering Structures. – 2008. – Vol. 30. – P. 1308–1318.
Herraiz, B. Energy-based method for sudden column failure scenarios: Theoretical, numerical and experimental analysis / B. Herraiz, T. Vogel, J. Russell // IABSE Workshop Helsinki 2015 : Safety, Robustness and Condition Assessment of Structures; International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering IABSE: Helsinki, Finland, 2015. – P. 70–77.
Bredow, R. Computer analysis of dynamic reliability of some concrete beam structure exhibiting random damping / R. Bredow, M. Kaminski // International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering. – 2021. – Vol. 26, № 1. – P. 45–64.
Quantification of model uncertainties of the energy-based method for dynamic column removal scenarios / L. Ding, Van R. Coile, W. Botte, R. Caspeele // Engineering Structures. – 2021. – Vol. 237. – P. 112057.
Wang, C. H. Study on nonlinear damping behavior of damaged recycled aggregate concrete beams / C. H. Wang, J. Z. Xiao, C. F. Liang // Structural Concrete. – 2021. – Vol. 22. – P. 1429–1444. – DOI: 10.1002/suco.202000707.
Charney, F. A. Unintended consequences of modeling damping in structures / F. A. Charney // Journal of Structural Engineering. – 2008. – Vol. 134. – P. 581–592.
Hall, J. F. Problems encountered from the use (or misuse) of Rayleigh damping / J. F. Hall // Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. – 2006. – Vol. 35. – P. 525–545.
Hybrid Framework for Simulating Building Collapse and Ruin Scenarios Using Finite Element Method and Physics Engine / Z. Zheng, Y. Tian, Z. B. Yang, X. Z. Lu // Applied Sciences. – 2020. – Vol. 10. – P. 4408.
Russell, J. M. Experimental investigation on the dynamic response of RC flat slabs after a sudden column loss / J. M. Russell, J. S. Owen, I. Hajirasouliha // Engineering Structures. – 2015. – Vol. 99. – P. 28–41.
Rate effect on the stress–strain behavior of concrete under uniaxial tensile stress / X. Gao, L. Zhou, X. Ren, J. Li // Structural Concrete. – 2020. – Vol. 22. – E815–E830. – DOI: 10.1002/suco.201900567.
Yung Tian. Dynamic Response of Reinforced Concrete Beams Following Instantaneous Removal of Bearing Column / Tian Yung, Su Youpo // International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials. – 2011. – Vol 5, No. 1. – P.19–28.
Тур, А. В. Сопротивление изгибаемых железобетонных элементов при внезапном приложении нагрузки : дис. … канд. техн. наук : 05.23.01 / Андрей Викторович Тур ; Брест. гос. техн. ун-т. – Брест, 2012. – 225 с.
Живучесть зданий и сооружений при запроектных воздействиях / В. И. Колчунов, Н. В. Клюева, Н. В. Андросова, А. С. Бухтиярова. – М. : АСВ, 2014. –208 с.
Herraiz, B. Simplified approach for analysing building structures subjected to sudden column removal scenarios / B. Herraiz, T. Vogel // In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014 Porto, Portugal, 30 June – 2 July 2014 / A. Cunha, E. Caetano, P. Ribeiro, G. Müller. – Porto, 2014. – P. 3467–3474. – DOI: 10.3929/ethz-a-010261494.
Gomez, Borja H. Robustness of Flat Slabs Structures Subjected To a sudden Column FailureScenario : dissertation : 23524 / Borja H. Gomez ; ETH Zurich, 2016.
Тамразян, А. Г. Концептуальные подходы к оценке живучести строительных конструкций, зданий и сооружений / А. Г. Тамразян // Железобетонные конструкции. – 2023. – Т. 3, № 3. – С. 62–74.
Живучесть зданий при особых воздействиях / В. И. Колчунов, В. В. Тур, Н. В. Федорова [и др.]. – М. : НИУ МГСУ, 2025. – 240 с.
Основы проектирования строительных конструкций : СН 2.01.01-2022. – Минск, 2022. – 65 с.
Бетонные и железобетонные конструкции : СП 5.03.01-2020. – Минск : Минстройархитектуры, 2020. – 123 с.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The work is provided under the terms of Creative Commons public license Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows an unlimited number of persons to reproduce and share the Licensed Material in all media and formats. Any use of the Licensed Material shall contain an identification of its Creator(s) and must be for non-commercial purposes only. Users may not prevent other individuals from taking any actions allowed by the license.


